How to generate a case study based on a website link

This is one of the MANY ways that you can generate a case study.

This process is not hard but requires a few elements to have success.

1. 1. Prompt that will guide the AI to write the case – use our free case generator to start
   2. Content to generate the case from – I used this source for reference – Content Source
   3. What do you want to use the case for? – Case exam, using the case method…
   4. Expectation management – always check and validate what the AI is writing based on your content
   5. An open mind
   6. Always source and cite content that is not yours!!!

This case is a simple example of how you can use a new event, content or article online to generate a case study about that topic for your students.

I am in no way supporting or affiliating with the story, topic or content for this case study. It was simply a topic that came available for this example.

Next Steps for this case

Add more details and length

Prompt: In the [Section to change] add more details specific to this content [provided details] that need to flow and integrate into this [section to change] so that it flows well and is seamless

Change elements for accuracy

Prompt: I need you to check the content in [section of interest or details to check] on the accuracy [type of accuracy] to make sure that it is real and fits with the narrative for the case. I need you to give me suggestions on where to get more information is the details are inaccurate so that I can be as true to the facts as possible

Create assessments such as discussion questions, MCQ’s etc

Generate 10 [assessment of your choice] that are difficult, detailed and robust for [level of student] and assess their [type of assessment goal – blooms taxonomy] and give me the answers below each question as well as where the content came from in the case. Be clear and direct with this information.

Remove headings and titles for better flow
Adjust the bias in the narrative based on your needs in class
The list goes on…..

Prompt Sequence

Prompt 1 was the initial prompt – (See Initial Prompt)

Prompt 2 was to generate a citation from the content source.

generate a citation from this link…https://www.marketwatch.com/story/as-gop-convention-nears-heres-how-stocks-have-performed-under-biden-vs-trump-5cf91328?mod=economy-politics

Prompt 3 was to generate a outline for the posting

Generate a short abstract of this case for someone to read and see if this is one they want to use

Prompt 4 was to generate an image

generate a new 16X9 featured image for this case

*****It would not generate one because of the political content

Prompt 5 was to get around that with no success

ok generate an image that does not infringe on your limitations

Prompt 6 was to generate a safe image based on the content

ok generate and image with this…A rising stock chart with the S&P 500 index prominently featured.
Abstract representations of two different leadership styles using contrasting colors (e.g., blue and red).

The Impact of Presidential Policies on Stock Market Performance: A Comparative Analysis of Biden and Trump Administrations

Introduction

The relationship between presidential policies and stock market performance has long been a subject of interest for economists, policymakers, and investors. This case study investigates the comparative impact of the Biden and Trump administrations on the S&P 500 index, focusing on the policies implemented during their respective terms and their effects on market dynamics. By analyzing the stock market performance under these two administrations, this research aims to provide insights into the broader economic implications of presidential policies and their influence on investor confidence.

Background

The S&P 500, a leading indicator of U.S. equities, reflects the performance of 500 large companies listed on stock exchanges in the United States. The index’s performance is often used as a barometer for the overall health of the U.S. economy and is influenced by a myriad of factors, including fiscal policies, economic conditions, and investor sentiment.

During the Trump administration (2017-2021), significant tax cuts, deregulation, and trade policies were introduced, which had various effects on different sectors of the economy. The early years of Trump’s term saw a bullish market, which was abruptly disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020. The pandemic led to a significant market downturn, followed by a rapid recovery fueled by unprecedented fiscal and monetary stimulus measures.

In contrast, the Biden administration (2021-present) has focused on expanding social programs, addressing climate change, and increasing corporate taxes. Biden’s term has also been marked by the ongoing management of the COVID-19 pandemic and efforts to support economic recovery through substantial government spending and infrastructure investments. The interplay of these policies with market performance provides a fertile ground for comparative analysis.

Research Questions

1. How have the fiscal and regulatory policies of the Trump and Biden administrations impacted the S&P 500 index?
2. What role did the COVID-19 pandemic play in influencing stock market performance during these two administrations?
3. How do investor perceptions of economic stability and growth differ between the two presidential terms?

Methodology

This case study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative analysis of stock market data with qualitative assessment of policy impacts. The primary data source is the historical performance of the S&P 500 index from January 2017 to July 2024. Additional data include macroeconomic indicators such as GDP growth, unemployment rates, and inflation.

Quantitative Analysis:

• Statistical analysis of S&P 500 index returns during the Trump and Biden administrations.
• Comparison of market volatility and trends in response to major policy announcements and economic events.
• Regression analysis to isolate the effects of specific policies on stock market performance.

Qualitative Analysis:

• Review of policy documents, executive orders, and legislative measures enacted during the two administrations.
• Expert interviews with economists and financial analysts to interpret the broader economic implications of these policies.
• Content analysis of media reports and investor sentiment surveys to gauge market reactions to policy changes.

Findings

The S&P 500 index experienced a 40% increase during the first 3.5 years of the Trump administration, driven by tax cuts and deregulation efforts that boosted corporate profits and investor confidence. However, the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic led to a sharp decline in early 2020, with the index losing nearly 30% in a matter of weeks. The subsequent recovery, supported by bipartisan stimulus measures, resulted in the S&P 500 ending Trump’s term with a net gain.

Under the Biden administration, the S&P 500 has risen by 45% from January 2021 to July 2024. This growth, despite initial concerns over higher corporate taxes and increased regulation, reflects investor optimism about the economic recovery and substantial government spending on infrastructure and social programs. The index’s performance under Biden has been relatively stable, with fewer instances of extreme volatility compared to the Trump era.

Discussion

The comparative analysis reveals that while both administrations have achieved significant stock market gains, the underlying drivers differ markedly. Trump’s policies, centered on tax cuts and deregulation, provided immediate boosts to corporate earnings and market performance. However, the market’s vulnerability to external shocks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighted the risks associated with this approach.

In contrast, Biden’s policies have focused on long-term economic stability and addressing systemic issues such as healthcare and infrastructure. While these measures initially raised concerns about increased government intervention and higher taxes, the steady market performance indicates a positive reception to the administration’s commitment to sustainable growth.

The COVID-19 pandemic played a pivotal role in shaping market dynamics during both administrations. The initial shock in 2020 and the subsequent recovery underscore the importance of government intervention and fiscal stimulus in stabilizing the economy. Investor confidence during these periods was significantly influenced by the perceived effectiveness of government responses to the crisis.

Conclusion

This case study demonstrates that presidential policies have a profound impact on stock market performance, influenced by both the nature of the policies and external economic conditions. The comparative analysis of the Trump and Biden administrations highlights the complexities of economic governance and the multifaceted relationship between policy decisions and market outcomes.

The findings suggest that while short-term market gains can be achieved through tax cuts and deregulation, long-term stability requires addressing underlying economic challenges and investing in sustainable growth. The role of government intervention, particularly during crises, is crucial in maintaining investor confidence and economic resilience.

Limitations and Future Research

This study is limited by its focus on the S&P 500 index and may not fully capture the broader economic impacts of presidential policies. Future research could expand the scope to include other economic indicators and international comparisons. Additionally, the evolving nature of economic policies and global conditions warrants ongoing analysis to understand the long-term effects of these administrations’ strategies.

Summary

In summary, the stock market performance under the Trump and Biden administrations provides valuable insights into the economic implications of presidential policies. The case study underscores the importance of balancing short-term gains with long-term stability and highlights the critical role of government intervention during economic crises. As policymakers and investors navigate future challenges, the lessons from these two administrations will remain pertinent in shaping effective economic strategies.

Initial Prompt

You are the best and most detailed case study writer in the world who will take this information and write a complete, LONG and Detailed case based on this information with the category and topic.
To create case studies, you need to follow a series of steps that involve understanding the case, defining its scope, preparing the data, and finally generating the case studies. Here is a detailed breakdown of the process:
1. Understand the Case: Firstly, understand what kind of case study you want to generate. This might include the topic Skip to main content Latest Watchlist Markets Investing Personal Finance Economy Retirement How To Invest 50¢ per Week Advertisement Home Economy & Politics In One Chart In One Chart As GOP convention nears, here’s how stocks have performed under Biden vs. Trump Last Updated: July 13, 2024 at 5:11 a.m. ET First Published: July 12, 2024 at 12:56 p.m. ET By Victor Reklaitis comments S&P 500 is up 45% under Biden, slightly better than the index’s gain of 40% at this stage in Trump’s term Get this article and all of MarketWatch. Access from any device. Anytime. Anywhere. SUBSCRIBE NOW: 50¢ PER WEEK Presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump and President Joe Biden are shown debating in Atlanta on June 27. Associated Press Referenced Symbols SPX +0.55% DJIA +0.62% This feature is powered by text-to-speech technology. Want to see it on more articles? Give your feedback below or email audiofeedback@marketwatch.com . Presumptive GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump and his fellow Republicans are looking to grab the spotlight in a big way starting Monday, as their national convention kicks off in Milwaukee. President Joe Biden and his fellow Democrats are slated to get their turn next month, when their convention begins Aug. 19 in Chicago. It’s possible Biden won’t end up as his party’s nominee, but for now he continues to say he’s remaining in the White House race despite concerns about his poor debate performance more than two weeks ago. Both conventions are likely to feature hyperbole about each nominee’s track record on economic issues and the opposition’s proposals. So what does the market itself say? The S&P 500 SPX, as of Thursday’s close, has gained 45% since Biden’s inauguration on Jan. 20, 2021. It’s a sizable rise over about three and a half years, especially because the gauge lost ground in 2022, tumbling 19% during that year, when it was hurt by the Federal Reserve’s push to raise interest rates in order to fight inflation. It’s also slightly greater than the S&P’s gain of 40% at the same stage in Trump’s term, as shown in the table below. Now Playing: Visit our Video Center Advertisement Dow Jones Market Data Many analysts say presidents tend to get too much credit or blame for the economy’s performance on their watch, including for how the S&P 500 SPX fares. In particular, the stock market’s DJIA plunge under Trump in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic probably would have occurred regardless of who was in the Oval Office at that uncertain time in 2020. “I don’t think anyone would say because there was a Democrat or Republican in the White House, how the market reacts to a global pandemic would be, at least in the early stages, materially different,” Ed Mills, a Washington policy analyst and managing director at Raymond James, told MarketWatch earlier this year. Support for COVID stimulus was “overwhelmingly bipartisan” at the pandemic’s onset, Mills added. Fed\’s rate hikes startBiden\’s inaugurationCOVID sell-offTrump\’s inauguration 2018\’19\’20\’21\’22\’23\’24200025003000350040004500500055006000 Biden and Trump have jousted over the stock market’s performance. The Democratic incumbent has jabbed at his Republican predecessor for predicting that a Biden administration would mean catastrophe for equities, while Trump has taken credit this year for the market’s advance. We Make The Markets Make Sense Understand how today’s global business practices, market dynamics, economic policies and more impact you with real-time news and analysis from MarketWatch. Subscribe Now: 50¢ per Week MarketWatch on Multiple devices Related: Trump and Biden play blame game on inflation. Here’s what prices did under their watch. On Friday, the main stock gauges were gaining as a headline number for wholesale prices came in slightly hotter than expected but as a core figure was below expectations, helping to keep in place expectations that the Fed could cut rates in September. Read on: How Kamala Harris’s policies could differ from Biden’s, if she’s the Democratic nominee Why Trump’s running-mate choice could matter for oil companies, banks, tech and other sectors The $7,500 federal EV tax credit is on the ballot in November Trump is trying to win a nonconsecutive term. Here’s how another president did it. Advertisement Partner Center Most Popular Read full story I am 65 with about $1M. My financial planner recommends a custom 60/40 portfolio and will meet with me 3x per year. But here’s what he wants to get paid for that … Read full story ‘I’m not jealous — just genuinely curious’: How can a woman work from home and mind her 3-year-old child at the same time? Read full story My friend left his $500K life insurance to his sister. Before he died, his wife pleaded with him to leave it to their son. What now? Read full story Biden or Trump: which candidate has a better tax policy proposal? Read full story OK, boomer: You’re hoarding your nest egg, but your kids need financial help now Advertisement Advertisement Read full story Read Next Fed’s favorite PCE price gauge set to show slower inflation and raise odds of rate cut The first decline in consumer prices in four years is just a starter dish for the Federal Reserve. The bank’s appetite to cut U.S. interest rates won’t be fully sated until it gets more weak readings from its favorite inflation gauge. More On MarketWatch Consumer sentiment falls to 8-month low on frustration with inflation Trump’s tax plan: These middle-class households could pay more ‘Vice President Trump’ got all the attention, but Biden made another gaffe many missed About the Author Victor Reklaitis Victor Reklaitis is a Washington Correspondent for MarketWatch. During his time at MarketWatch, he also has served in roles in the London and New York newsrooms. Prior to joining MarketWatch, he worked at Investor’s Business Daily and for newspapers in Virginia. Advertisement Advertisement Copyright © 2024 MarketWatch, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Notice | Cookie Notice Facebook Twitter Linkedin Download from the App StoreDownload from the Google Play Store MarketWatch Customer Center Contact Us Newsroom Roster Virtual Stock Exchange MarketWatch Guides Copyright Policy Manage Notifications Cancel My Subscription Company Dow Jones Code of Conduct Corrections Reprints & Licensing Digital Self Service Your Ad Choices Corporate Subscriptions Accessibility Dow Jones Network The Wall Street Journal Barron\’s Investor\’s Business Daily BigCharts Financial News London realtor.com Mansion Global Dow Jones Smart Money Intraday Data provided by FACTSET and subject to terms of use. Historical and current end-of-day data provided by FACTSET. All quotes are in local exchange time. Real-time last sale data for U.S. stock quotes reflect trades reported through Nasdaq only. Intraday data delayed at least 15 minutes or per exchange requirements., the intended audience, the structure of the case study, and the kinds of information you want it to include. These factors will guide your preparation of the data. Use REAL and Believable business names and protagonist names, none of this fintech or omnibrand naming. Make the names as realistic as possible. Here is an example of a CASE. Use it for reference NOT based on content but based on length to write ONLY….

The Evolution of FreshBox: A Case Study in Disrupting the Meal Prep Industry

In 2015, the vibrant streets of Boston became the birthplace of FreshBox, a visionary meal prep
delivery service conceived by college friends Sarah and David. Their shared ambition was not merely to
create a business but to transform the culinary landscape. Sarah, armed with extensive knowledge in
nutrition, was passionate about bringing balanced and wholesome diets to the forefront of busy
lifestyles. David, with his prowess in logistics, complemented this vision by devising efficient systems
to ensure timely and reliable meal deliveries. Together, they embarked on a journey to make healthy
eating both accessible and enjoyable.
The ethos of FreshBox was built upon the twin pillars of quality and customer satisfaction. This
philosophy went beyond just delivering meals; it was about delivering enriching culinary experiences.
Starting with a modest operation in the Boston area, the duo focused on sourcing fresh, locally-grown
ingredients, creating a menu that was a harmonious blend of nutrition, taste, and variety. Every dish was
meticulously crafted, balancing health benefits with culinary delight, ensuring that each meal was not
just nourishing but also a feast for the senses.
As FreshBox began to serve neighborhoods in Boston, it quickly garnered a reputation for its dedication
to excellence and personalized service. Customers appreciated not just the quality of the meals but also
the attention to detail and responsiveness to feedback. This approach helped FreshBox to evolve its
offerings continually, aligning closely with the preferences and dietary needs of its customers. The
companys commitment to excellence and customer-centric approach rapidly made FreshBox a local
favorite, setting the foundation for its growth and future challenges in the dynamic meal prep industry.
Strategic Differentiation in a Saturated Market and Internal Conflicts
As FreshBox’s journey progressed, the company encountered a critical challenge: distinguishing itself
in the highly competitive meal prep industry while managing the internal pressures of rapid growth. The
market, saturated with numerous competitors offering similar meal delivery services, required
FreshBox to find a unique edge to stand out. This need for differentiation was not just about being
different; it was about maintaining the essence of what made FreshBox special in the first place.
Internally, the situation was becoming increasingly complex. The rapid expansion, a clear indicator of
FreshBoxs success, started to stretch the companys resources thin. The staff, crucial in delivering
FreshBoxs promise of quality and convenience, began to feel the burden of this growth. As the team’s responsibilities multiplied, maintaining the exceptional level of customer service that FreshBox was
known for became more challenging. This escalation in workload risked impacting not only the wellbeing
of the employees but also the quality of customer interactions – a vital element of FreshBoxs
appeal.
The dual challenge FreshBox faced was intricate. Externally, it was about strategic positioning in a
crowded market, where every player vied for consumer attention with similar promises of health, taste,
and convenience. Internally, it was about managing growth without compromising the values and
service quality that had fueled the companys initial success. This scenario presented a delicate
balancing act for Sarah and David. They needed to innovate and expand, but not at the expense of their
team’s morale or the customer experience that had been the foundation of their brand identity. It was a
dilemma that required a nuanced approach, blending strategic market differentiation with sensitive
internal management.
Growth Numbers and Future Prospects
Since its inception, FreshBox has charted a path of notable growth, marked by impressive figures. In
the first year, the companys customer base grew by an encouraging 20%. This initial success was just
the beginning, as the subsequent year saw an even more significant increase, with a 40% rise in
customers. This consistent upward trend has not only been a testament to FreshBoxs appeal but also to
its potential for further expansion.
As FreshBox looks to the future, the growth prospects appear even more promising. With plans to
expand into new cities, projections indicate that the customer base could potentially double in the next
two years. To put this into perspective, if FreshBox had 1,000 customers in its first year, this number
increased to 1,200 in the second year and then jumped to approximately 1,680 by the end of the third
year. Based on these trends, FreshBox could be serving well over 3,000 customers in the next couple of
years following its expansion.
This expected growth, while a clear indicator of success, also highlights the need for strategic scaling.
FreshBoxs internal infrastructure, from staff management to logistical capabilities, must be
strengthened to handle this surge in customer numbers. The anticipated doubling of the customer base is
not just a numerical increase; it’s a significant leap that demands meticulous planning and resource
allocation to ensure that the quality of service remains uncompromised.
FreshBoxs journey from serving 1,000 customers to potentially over 3,000 in the near future
encapsulates both the companys remarkable success and the challenges that come with scaling at such a
pace. As FreshBox navigates this growth, the focus remains on balancing expansion with maintaining
the high standards that have been key to its success.
Organizational Structure and Bottlenecks
The structure of FreshBox, initially a boon in its startup phase, began to show signs of strain as the
company expanded. At the heart of this issue were Sarah and David, who were deeply involved in every
key operational area. Their responsibilities ranged from detailed tasks like menu development,
incorporating both culinary expertise and nutritional knowledge, to managing relationships with
suppliers to ensure quality and sustainability in their offerings.

Their roles extended into customer service and marketing as well. Directly handling customer service
issues, while beneficial for personal customer relationships, became increasingly demanding with the
growing client base. Moreover, their involvement in guiding the marketing team, crucial for the brands
growth and visibility, was becoming challenging as the need for more sophisticated marketing efforts
grew.
This comprehensive involvement, however, led to a bottleneck at the top. As decision-makers, Sarah
and David were overwhelmed, which in turn affected the efficiency of decision-making processes. This
situation was exacerbated by the limited staffing in key departments. The customer service team was
under-resourced, leading to potential lapses in maintaining the high service standards that FreshBox
prided itself on. Similarly, the marketing team, though effective, was too small to handle the expanding
scope of work required for a growing business.
Thus, FreshBox faced a critical juncture. The over-centralization of responsibilities with the founders,
coupled with understaffed departments, hindered the companys ability to scale efficiently. Addressing
these organizational challenges became imperative. It was clear that expanding the team and redefining
roles, especially transitioning Sarah and David to more strategic and less operational roles, was
essential for sustaining FreshBoxs growth and maintaining its competitive edge in the industry.
Here’s the organizational chart for FreshBox, illustrating the structure and hierarchy within the
company:
• At the top are the Founders, Sarah and David, who oversee all major functions.
• Directly under them are four key areas: Menu Development, Supplier Relations, Customer
Service, and Marketing.

• The Customer Service and Marketing departments further branch out into teams of Customer
Service Representatives and the Marketing Team, respectively.
Conclusion and Dilemma
In the wake of this expansion and organizational stress, Sarah and David found themselves at a critical
juncture. Their ambition to continue revolutionizing the meal prep industry was clear, but the path to
achieving this, amidst a saturated market and internal operational challenges, was murky. The founders
recognized that their problems – staff pressure, compromised customer experience, and difficulty in
strategic differentiation – were symptomatic of deeper issues. These included the company’s readiness
for growth, an unclear internal message, and a need for a more robust, scalable organizational structure.
Sarah and David pondered over their next move. How could they maintain their ethos of quality and
customer-centricity while navigating the complexities of expansion and market differentiation? Could
FreshBox evolve without losing its essence? These questions remained unanswered, presenting a
dilemma that would shape the future of their entrepreneurial journey.
>>>>understand what you have written and go step by step critiquing what you have generated. Assess if what you have written is in complete and detailed paragraph form and what can be added to enable the professionalism and academic writing needs of this case.
>>>>The writing length MUST be WRITTEN IN PARAGRAPHS and COMPLETE sentences over bullet points, detailed, reflective of the content and build upon itself so that the final product is detailed.

1. Generate a Main Theme is Economics & Public Policy.
2. The topic is Skip to main content Latest Watchlist Markets Investing Personal Finance Economy Retirement How To Invest 50¢ per Week Advertisement Home Economy & Politics In One Chart In One Chart As GOP convention nears, here’s how stocks have performed under Biden vs. Trump Last Updated: July 13, 2024 at 5:11 a.m. ET First Published: July 12, 2024 at 12:56 p.m. ET By Victor Reklaitis comments S&P 500 is up 45% under Biden, slightly better than the index’s gain of 40% at this stage in Trump’s term Get this article and all of MarketWatch. Access from any device. Anytime. Anywhere. SUBSCRIBE NOW: 50¢ PER WEEK Presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump and President Joe Biden are shown debating in Atlanta on June 27. Associated Press Referenced Symbols SPX +0.55% DJIA +0.62% This feature is powered by text-to-speech technology. Want to see it on more articles? Give your feedback below or email audiofeedback@marketwatch.com . Presumptive GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump and his fellow Republicans are looking to grab the spotlight in a big way starting Monday, as their national convention kicks off in Milwaukee. President Joe Biden and his fellow Democrats are slated to get their turn next month, when their convention begins Aug. 19 in Chicago. It’s possible Biden won’t end up as his party’s nominee, but for now he continues to say he’s remaining in the White House race despite concerns about his poor debate performance more than two weeks ago. Both conventions are likely to feature hyperbole about each nominee’s track record on economic issues and the opposition’s proposals. So what does the market itself say? The S&P 500 SPX, as of Thursday’s close, has gained 45% since Biden’s inauguration on Jan. 20, 2021. It’s a sizable rise over about three and a half years, especially because the gauge lost ground in 2022, tumbling 19% during that year, when it was hurt by the Federal Reserve’s push to raise interest rates in order to fight inflation. It’s also slightly greater than the S&P’s gain of 40% at the same stage in Trump’s term, as shown in the table below. Now Playing: Visit our Video Center Advertisement Dow Jones Market Data Many analysts say presidents tend to get too much credit or blame for the economy’s performance on their watch, including for how the S&P 500 SPX fares. In particular, the stock market’s DJIA plunge under Trump in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic probably would have occurred regardless of who was in the Oval Office at that uncertain time in 2020. “I don’t think anyone would say because there was a Democrat or Republican in the White House, how the market reacts to a global pandemic would be, at least in the early stages, materially different,” Ed Mills, a Washington policy analyst and managing director at Raymond James, told MarketWatch earlier this year. Support for COVID stimulus was “overwhelmingly bipartisan” at the pandemic’s onset, Mills added. Fed\’s rate hikes startBiden\’s inaugurationCOVID sell-offTrump\’s inauguration 2018\’19\’20\’21\’22\’23\’24200025003000350040004500500055006000 Biden and Trump have jousted over the stock market’s performance. The Democratic incumbent has jabbed at his Republican predecessor for predicting that a Biden administration would mean catastrophe for equities, while Trump has taken credit this year for the market’s advance. We Make The Markets Make Sense Understand how today’s global business practices, market dynamics, economic policies and more impact you with real-time news and analysis from MarketWatch. Subscribe Now: 50¢ per Week MarketWatch on Multiple devices Related: Trump and Biden play blame game on inflation. Here’s what prices did under their watch. On Friday, the main stock gauges were gaining as a headline number for wholesale prices came in slightly hotter than expected but as a core figure was below expectations, helping to keep in place expectations that the Fed could cut rates in September. Read on: How Kamala Harris’s policies could differ from Biden’s, if she’s the Democratic nominee Why Trump’s running-mate choice could matter for oil companies, banks, tech and other sectors The $7,500 federal EV tax credit is on the ballot in November Trump is trying to win a nonconsecutive term. Here’s how another president did it. Advertisement Partner Center Most Popular Read full story I am 65 with about $1M. My financial planner recommends a custom 60/40 portfolio and will meet with me 3x per year. But here’s what he wants to get paid for that … Read full story ‘I’m not jealous — just genuinely curious’: How can a woman work from home and mind her 3-year-old child at the same time? Read full story My friend left his $500K life insurance to his sister. Before he died, his wife pleaded with him to leave it to their son. What now? Read full story Biden or Trump: which candidate has a better tax policy proposal? Read full story OK, boomer: You’re hoarding your nest egg, but your kids need financial help now Advertisement Advertisement Read full story Read Next Fed’s favorite PCE price gauge set to show slower inflation and raise odds of rate cut The first decline in consumer prices in four years is just a starter dish for the Federal Reserve. The bank’s appetite to cut U.S. interest rates won’t be fully sated until it gets more weak readings from its favorite inflation gauge. More On MarketWatch Consumer sentiment falls to 8-month low on frustration with inflation Trump’s tax plan: These middle-class households could pay more ‘Vice President Trump’ got all the attention, but Biden made another gaffe many missed About the Author Victor Reklaitis Victor Reklaitis is a Washington Correspondent for MarketWatch. During his time at MarketWatch, he also has served in roles in the London and New York newsrooms. Prior to joining MarketWatch, he worked at Investor’s Business Daily and for newspapers in Virginia. Advertisement Advertisement Copyright © 2024 MarketWatch, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Notice | Cookie Notice Facebook Twitter Linkedin Download from the App StoreDownload from the Google Play Store MarketWatch Customer Center Contact Us Newsroom Roster Virtual Stock Exchange MarketWatch Guides Copyright Policy Manage Notifications Cancel My Subscription Company Dow Jones Code of Conduct Corrections Reprints & Licensing Digital Self Service Your Ad Choices Corporate Subscriptions Accessibility Dow Jones Network The Wall Street Journal Barron\’s Investor\’s Business Daily BigCharts Financial News London realtor.com Mansion Global Dow Jones Smart Money Intraday Data provided by FACTSET and subject to terms of use. Historical and current end-of-day data provided by FACTSET. All quotes are in local exchange time. Real-time last sale data for U.S. stock quotes reflect trades reported through Nasdaq only. Intraday data delayed at least 15 minutes or per exchange requirements..
3. Type of case: Research Case.

Data for establishing kinds of cases Case studies can be used in various fields to analyze and understand different aspects of a particular subject or situation. They can be categorized in different ways based on the purpose they serve, the approach they take, or the structure they follow.

Here are a few categories of case studies based on the structure or approach:
1. **Exploratory Case Studies**: These are condensed case studies performed before implementing a large-scale investigation. The primary goal is to help identify questions and select the types of measurement prior to the main investigation.
2. **Descriptive Case Studies**: These involve starting with a descriptive theory. The subjects are then observed and the information gathered is compared to the pre-existing theory.
3. **Explanatory Case Studies**: These are often used to do causal investigations. In other words, researchers use these to study how event A leads to event B. These structural categories allow you to decide on the kind of case studies you will be generating. If you are focusing on AI-generated case studies, you might want to keep the structure more streamlined and simple. Descriptive or illustrative case studies might be best suited for AI generation because of their straightforward structure.

>>>>The structure of the case is….Research Case…. When considering your target audience, think about who will be most interested in the topics you are covering in your case studies. This could be businesses looking for insights into specific situations, students learning about particular subjects, or professionals seeking knowledge or understanding of specific phenomena. The type of case studies you decide to produce can definitely affect your target audience. For instance, exploratory case studies might be more useful for academic or research audiences who are planning in-depth investigations. On the other hand, descriptive or illustrative case studies might be more suited for a more general audience looking for a comprehensive understanding of a particular subject.

Your answers to these questions will help define the kind of data you need to effectively write the case study.
1. Case study scope: The industry can be anything, the focus or subject for the topic is your discretion and the issue is yours to decide; this is a Type of case: Research Case.
2. Data Preparation: Once you have a clear understanding of the type of case studies you want to generate, you’ll need to collect and prepare the data to train the model. You might consider the following steps:
3. * Data Formatting: In order for the model to understand your data, you need to format it correctly. This means deciding on a consistent structure for your case studies and making sure all of your data follows this structure. * I need some figures and numbers that can add to the case story; you generate them and make them flow.
4. Generating Case Studies: Once the model is fine-tuned, you can generate case studies. You can do this by providing the model with a prompt and asking it to generate the rest of the text. The prompt might include some details about the case study you want, and the model will generate text based on what it learned during fine-tuning.
5. Generate a university-level Case Study that is detailed and consistent in the theme of Economics & Public Policy and the topic is Skip to main content Latest Watchlist Markets Investing Personal Finance Economy Retirement How To Invest 50¢ per Week Advertisement Home Economy & Politics In One Chart In One Chart As GOP convention nears, here’s how stocks have performed under Biden vs. Trump Last Updated: July 13, 2024 at 5:11 a.m. ET First Published: July 12, 2024 at 12:56 p.m. ET By Victor Reklaitis comments S&P 500 is up 45% under Biden, slightly better than the index’s gain of 40% at this stage in Trump’s term Get this article and all of MarketWatch. Access from any device. Anytime. Anywhere. SUBSCRIBE NOW: 50¢ PER WEEK Presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump and President Joe Biden are shown debating in Atlanta on June 27. Associated Press Referenced Symbols SPX +0.55% DJIA +0.62% This feature is powered by text-to-speech technology. Want to see it on more articles? Give your feedback below or email audiofeedback@marketwatch.com . Presumptive GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump and his fellow Republicans are looking to grab the spotlight in a big way starting Monday, as their national convention kicks off in Milwaukee. President Joe Biden and his fellow Democrats are slated to get their turn next month, when their convention begins Aug. 19 in Chicago. It’s possible Biden won’t end up as his party’s nominee, but for now he continues to say he’s remaining in the White House race despite concerns about his poor debate performance more than two weeks ago. Both conventions are likely to feature hyperbole about each nominee’s track record on economic issues and the opposition’s proposals. So what does the market itself say? The S&P 500 SPX, as of Thursday’s close, has gained 45% since Biden’s inauguration on Jan. 20, 2021. It’s a sizable rise over about three and a half years, especially because the gauge lost ground in 2022, tumbling 19% during that year, when it was hurt by the Federal Reserve’s push to raise interest rates in order to fight inflation. It’s also slightly greater than the S&P’s gain of 40% at the same stage in Trump’s term, as shown in the table below. Now Playing: Visit our Video Center Advertisement Dow Jones Market Data Many analysts say presidents tend to get too much credit or blame for the economy’s performance on their watch, including for how the S&P 500 SPX fares. In particular, the stock market’s DJIA plunge under Trump in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic probably would have occurred regardless of who was in the Oval Office at that uncertain time in 2020. “I don’t think anyone would say because there was a Democrat or Republican in the White House, how the market reacts to a global pandemic would be, at least in the early stages, materially different,” Ed Mills, a Washington policy analyst and managing director at Raymond James, told MarketWatch earlier this year. Support for COVID stimulus was “overwhelmingly bipartisan” at the pandemic’s onset, Mills added. Fed\’s rate hikes startBiden\’s inaugurationCOVID sell-offTrump\’s inauguration 2018\’19\’20\’21\’22\’23\’24200025003000350040004500500055006000 Biden and Trump have jousted over the stock market’s performance. The Democratic incumbent has jabbed at his Republican predecessor for predicting that a Biden administration would mean catastrophe for equities, while Trump has taken credit this year for the market’s advance. We Make The Markets Make Sense Understand how today’s global business practices, market dynamics, economic policies and more impact you with real-time news and analysis from MarketWatch. Subscribe Now: 50¢ per Week MarketWatch on Multiple devices Related: Trump and Biden play blame game on inflation. Here’s what prices did under their watch. On Friday, the main stock gauges were gaining as a headline number for wholesale prices came in slightly hotter than expected but as a core figure was below expectations, helping to keep in place expectations that the Fed could cut rates in September. Read on: How Kamala Harris’s policies could differ from Biden’s, if she’s the Democratic nominee Why Trump’s running-mate choice could matter for oil companies, banks, tech and other sectors The $7,500 federal EV tax credit is on the ballot in November Trump is trying to win a nonconsecutive term. Here’s how another president did it. Advertisement Partner Center Most Popular Read full story I am 65 with about $1M. My financial planner recommends a custom 60/40 portfolio and will meet with me 3x per year. But here’s what he wants to get paid for that … Read full story ‘I’m not jealous — just genuinely curious’: How can a woman work from home and mind her 3-year-old child at the same time? Read full story My friend left his $500K life insurance to his sister. Before he died, his wife pleaded with him to leave it to their son. What now? Read full story Biden or Trump: which candidate has a better tax policy proposal? Read full story OK, boomer: You’re hoarding your nest egg, but your kids need financial help now Advertisement Advertisement Read full story Read Next Fed’s favorite PCE price gauge set to show slower inflation and raise odds of rate cut The first decline in consumer prices in four years is just a starter dish for the Federal Reserve. The bank’s appetite to cut U.S. interest rates won’t be fully sated until it gets more weak readings from its favorite inflation gauge. More On MarketWatch Consumer sentiment falls to 8-month low on frustration with inflation Trump’s tax plan: These middle-class households could pay more ‘Vice President Trump’ got all the attention, but Biden made another gaffe many missed About the Author Victor Reklaitis Victor Reklaitis is a Washington Correspondent for MarketWatch. During his time at MarketWatch, he also has served in roles in the London and New York newsrooms. Prior to joining MarketWatch, he worked at Investor’s Business Daily and for newspapers in Virginia. Advertisement Advertisement Copyright © 2024 MarketWatch, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Notice | Cookie Notice Facebook Twitter Linkedin Download from the App StoreDownload from the Google Play Store MarketWatch Customer Center Contact Us Newsroom Roster Virtual Stock Exchange MarketWatch Guides Copyright Policy Manage Notifications Cancel My Subscription Company Dow Jones Code of Conduct Corrections Reprints & Licensing Digital Self Service Your Ad Choices Corporate Subscriptions Accessibility Dow Jones Network The Wall Street Journal Barron\’s Investor\’s Business Daily BigCharts Financial News London realtor.com Mansion Global Dow Jones Smart Money Intraday Data provided by FACTSET and subject to terms of use. Historical and current end-of-day data provided by FACTSET. All quotes are in local exchange time. Real-time last sale data for U.S. stock quotes reflect trades reported through Nasdaq only. Intraday data delayed at least 15 minutes or per exchange requirements.. The writing needs to be complete, straightforward, and not biased towards any one player in the case. The topic is Skip to main content Latest Watchlist Markets Investing Personal Finance Economy Retirement How To Invest 50¢ per Week Advertisement Home Economy & Politics In One Chart In One Chart As GOP convention nears, here’s how stocks have performed under Biden vs. Trump Last Updated: July 13, 2024 at 5:11 a.m. ET First Published: July 12, 2024 at 12:56 p.m. ET By Victor Reklaitis comments S&P 500 is up 45% under Biden, slightly better than the index’s gain of 40% at this stage in Trump’s term Get this article and all of MarketWatch. Access from any device. Anytime. Anywhere. SUBSCRIBE NOW: 50¢ PER WEEK Presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump and President Joe Biden are shown debating in Atlanta on June 27. Associated Press Referenced Symbols SPX +0.55% DJIA +0.62% This feature is powered by text-to-speech technology. Want to see it on more articles? Give your feedback below or email audiofeedback@marketwatch.com . Presumptive GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump and his fellow Republicans are looking to grab the spotlight in a big way starting Monday, as their national convention kicks off in Milwaukee. President Joe Biden and his fellow Democrats are slated to get their turn next month, when their convention begins Aug. 19 in Chicago. It’s possible Biden won’t end up as his party’s nominee, but for now he continues to say he’s remaining in the White House race despite concerns about his poor debate performance more than two weeks ago. Both conventions are likely to feature hyperbole about each nominee’s track record on economic issues and the opposition’s proposals. So what does the market itself say? The S&P 500 SPX, as of Thursday’s close, has gained 45% since Biden’s inauguration on Jan. 20, 2021. It’s a sizable rise over about three and a half years, especially because the gauge lost ground in 2022, tumbling 19% during that year, when it was hurt by the Federal Reserve’s push to raise interest rates in order to fight inflation. It’s also slightly greater than the S&P’s gain of 40% at the same stage in Trump’s term, as shown in the table below. Now Playing: Visit our Video Center Advertisement Dow Jones Market Data Many analysts say presidents tend to get too much credit or blame for the economy’s performance on their watch, including for how the S&P 500 SPX fares. In particular, the stock market’s DJIA plunge under Trump in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic probably would have occurred regardless of who was in the Oval Office at that uncertain time in 2020. “I don’t think anyone would say because there was a Democrat or Republican in the White House, how the market reacts to a global pandemic would be, at least in the early stages, materially different,” Ed Mills, a Washington policy analyst and managing director at Raymond James, told MarketWatch earlier this year. Support for COVID stimulus was “overwhelmingly bipartisan” at the pandemic’s onset, Mills added. Fed\’s rate hikes startBiden\’s inaugurationCOVID sell-offTrump\’s inauguration 2018\’19\’20\’21\’22\’23\’24200025003000350040004500500055006000 Biden and Trump have jousted over the stock market’s performance. The Democratic incumbent has jabbed at his Republican predecessor for predicting that a Biden administration would mean catastrophe for equities, while Trump has taken credit this year for the market’s advance. We Make The Markets Make Sense Understand how today’s global business practices, market dynamics, economic policies and more impact you with real-time news and analysis from MarketWatch. Subscribe Now: 50¢ per Week MarketWatch on Multiple devices Related: Trump and Biden play blame game on inflation. Here’s what prices did under their watch. On Friday, the main stock gauges were gaining as a headline number for wholesale prices came in slightly hotter than expected but as a core figure was below expectations, helping to keep in place expectations that the Fed could cut rates in September. Read on: How Kamala Harris’s policies could differ from Biden’s, if she’s the Democratic nominee Why Trump’s running-mate choice could matter for oil companies, banks, tech and other sectors The $7,500 federal EV tax credit is on the ballot in November Trump is trying to win a nonconsecutive term. Here’s how another president did it. Advertisement Partner Center Most Popular Read full story I am 65 with about $1M. My financial planner recommends a custom 60/40 portfolio and will meet with me 3x per year. But here’s what he wants to get paid for that … Read full story ‘I’m not jealous — just genuinely curious’: How can a woman work from home and mind her 3-year-old child at the same time? Read full story My friend left his $500K life insurance to his sister. Before he died, his wife pleaded with him to leave it to their son. What now? Read full story Biden or Trump: which candidate has a better tax policy proposal? Read full story OK, boomer: You’re hoarding your nest egg, but your kids need financial help now Advertisement Advertisement Read full story Read Next Fed’s favorite PCE price gauge set to show slower inflation and raise odds of rate cut The first decline in consumer prices in four years is just a starter dish for the Federal Reserve. The bank’s appetite to cut U.S. interest rates won’t be fully sated until it gets more weak readings from its favorite inflation gauge. More On MarketWatch Consumer sentiment falls to 8-month low on frustration with inflation Trump’s tax plan: These middle-class households could pay more ‘Vice President Trump’ got all the attention, but Biden made another gaffe many missed About the Author Victor Reklaitis Victor Reklaitis is a Washington Correspondent for MarketWatch. During his time at MarketWatch, he also has served in roles in the London and New York newsrooms. Prior to joining MarketWatch, he worked at Investor’s Business Daily and for newspapers in Virginia. Advertisement Advertisement Copyright © 2024 MarketWatch, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Notice | Cookie Notice Facebook Twitter Linkedin Download from the App StoreDownload from the Google Play Store MarketWatch Customer Center Contact Us Newsroom Roster Virtual Stock Exchange MarketWatch Guides Copyright Policy Manage Notifications Cancel My Subscription Company Dow Jones Code of Conduct Corrections Reprints & Licensing Digital Self Service Your Ad Choices Corporate Subscriptions Accessibility Dow Jones Network The Wall Street Journal Barron\’s Investor\’s Business Daily BigCharts Financial News London realtor.com Mansion Global Dow Jones Smart Money Intraday Data provided by FACTSET and subject to terms of use. Historical and current end-of-day data provided by FACTSET. All quotes are in local exchange time. Real-time last sale data for U.S. stock quotes reflect trades reported through Nasdaq only. Intraday data delayed at least 15 minutes or per exchange requirements., and have enough detail in the scenario that students have enough time to read the case (3 pages in length) and then take their knowledge and apply that critical thinking to the case questions that we will create after. Here is some information on why people use cases.

:::::::Why are case studies used? A case allows (the student) to step figuratively into the position of a particular decision-maker. Cases allow students to put themselves in the place of actual leaders and decision-makers. Students are able to analyze situations, develop alternatives, choose plans of action and implementation, and communicate and defend their findings in small groups and in class. Cases are used to test the understanding of theory, to connect theory with application, and to develop theoretical insight. Cases are one of the best ways to enable students to learn by doing. The Case study you generate needs to follow the this format EXCLUSIVELY – Research Case.

General Research Case Format: A general research case study begins with an introduction to the research topic, detailing its relevance, significance, and the research questions or hypotheses being investigated. This section provides context about the subject matter, its importance in the field, and the objectives of the research. Background information includes an overview of existing literature, previous studies, and theoretical frameworks related to the topic. The case then outlines the research methodology, describing the approach, methods, and procedures used to collect and analyze data. This section includes details on the research design, sample selection, data collection techniques (such as surveys, interviews, experiments, or observations), and analytical tools or software employed. It also highlights any challenges faced during the research process and the steps taken to address them. The findings section presents the results of the research, offering a comprehensive analysis of the data collected. This includes statistical analyses, thematic findings, and any patterns or trends identified. Visual aids such as charts, graphs, and tables may be used to illustrate key points. The discussion interprets the findings in the context of the research questions or hypotheses, comparing them with existing literature and theoretical perspectives. It also explores the implications of the results for the field, practical applications, and potential areas for future research. The conclusion of the case study summarizes the main findings and their significance, reinforcing the researchs contributions to the field. It discusses the limitations of the study and provides recommendations for further investigation. A summary recaps the key points, ensuring a clear understanding of the research topic, methodology, findings, and conclusions.